onionsoupmix ([info]onionsoupmix) wrote,
@ 2009-05-17 09:44:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:hashkafa, women

Women's Empowerment, Part Two
In my previous post, [info]mindycl wrote:

I'm just a little surprised that you even think women are empowered in judaism. we're second class citizens. were totally not empowered. Its not something I mind, I'm not a feminist. But your very premise puzzles me...I guess because I was raised in this man-centric culture and we women are taught to never be seen, never be heard, stay in the kitchen yada yada yada and I'm so used to it, that if I were to explore it and become resentful i'd be in a terrible place in my community, be looked down upon by dh and parents etc - it's usually the start of a rebellion which leads to going OTCD. It's just not something I thinkn about. This is how I was raised, I'm cool with it, and it's totally fine. I'm so not a feminist. I'm content with staying in the kitchen...
 
I want to talk about her post. It threw me for a loop because I'm so used to people insisting Judaism treats women equally. I think Mindy is a kind, sincere person who is doing everyone a favor by being honest about her culture. So, in constrast to my usual policy, I will have to delete insulting comments about her and her derech. But I want to discuss what she wrote. So here are the questions I'm interested in, please feel free to respond or add:

1. Do you think this view of women is limited just to that particular branch of Orthodoxy? Mindy belongs to a non-chabad chassidic group, maybe Satmar, I'm not sure. Do you think only her group sees women as second-class citizens? Or do you think this is actually a perspective held by most Orthodox adherents and some of them hide it better than others? Or do you think that Judaism is changing, but some groups specifically choose to hold on to the social norms of  the pre-feminist days? How does halacha figure into this? How are halachos which reflect negatively on women's roles adhered to or minimized or changed?

2. Do you think God could condone a hierarchial system like this? In other words, if there is a God and He created the world, do you think that He could have set up a system in which women are meant to be subservient? Or does God create all people as equals and  this is a man-made invention, something men of all religions did for their own self-serving interests? How do you see the curses in Bereishis, if you believe the text is Divine or Divinely-inspired? Is it just that God was describing how the world would be and that men would dominate women, but that can change with time or is an inherent, immutable part of the overall cosmic plan? How is this different than the hierarchy with regards to cohanim and leviim, which clearly seems to be endorsed by Judaism?

3. Do you think women can be truly happy and fulfilled in this sort of system? Do you think that most adherents of a group who are considered second-class citizens are just socially conditioned to adhere to the rules, not to rock the boat? Or do you think people can find real satisfaction from that kind of life? What about Untouchables in the Hindu caste system?

I personally think that the basic premises of Judaism is that women are second class citizens, because this was the social norm way back when halacha was codified. Most sects still follow that mode today, although some groups, like chabad, are very inventive in the explanations and rationales that they come up with. Some sections of Modern Orthodoxy openly reject some of these premises and have women's minyanim and so on, but they are considered fringe, a bit on the conservative side of things. I think God created people equal and all the hierarchies are man-made. But I think that people can convince themselves that God allows for these hierarchies because their social norms support that. So, in other words, if you have grown up in a culture which treats women as subservient and second-class, it's not difficult to believe that God set it up this way. What do you think?




(97 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]kmelion
2009-05-17 02:57 pm UTC (link)
It's all about Messorah... it's why many women feel like second class citizens and many things are labeled Modern Orthodox fringe.

I call it 'lies my Rebbe told me' and when I came to this realization it nearly caused me to go off the derech.

(And yes, Mindy is Satmar).

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 03:14 pm UTC
All people are created equal. ! or ?
(Anonymous)
2009-05-17 03:50 pm UTC (link)
This oft-repeated refrain, when taken out of its narrow legal meaning, is nonsense, and an obvious one at that. People are most certainly NOT "created equal" in terms of their abilities. People are, in fact, born with vastly varying talents and equally vastly varying capacities for heightened consciousness. This holds true for both men and women.

It might be true that typically women tend to be less cerebral than men. It might also be true that women tend to "think" with their hearts rather than their brains. An yes, in the realm of halacha women are indeed "second class citizens" (if you prefer to use this kind of bombastic language). However the realm of halacha is not the entirety of life (no, I am not suggesting that Halacha doesn't govern all life endeavors.) There are SO many other creative endeavors beside deciding on the Law...

To have an iron-clad rule that "all women belong in the kitchen" is just stupidity, one not supported by any Jewish law. Many women do happily belong in the kitchen. Many men do happily being doing menial labor. But then there are women who have other talents and capacities. They should be given all the opportunity and support to fulfill their potential.

So should women be able to become Rabbis – hell, NO! But should they become doctors, lawyers, CEOs, college professors, poetesses, teachers, spiritual leaders – hell, YES!

-cfkaMP

P.S. Culinary ability, I have observed, has little to nothing to do with smarts. A woman who "stays in the kitchen" all her life can still remain an uninspired cook...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: All people are created equal. ! or ?
(Anonymous)
2009-05-17 03:57 pm UTC (link)
I realize that there are communities where custom reigns supreme and these avenues are not so accessible to women. The only thing I can say is that nothing is for nothing. Life in that kind of a community has numerous advantages, but they come at a price...

-cfkaMP

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: All people are created equal. ! or ?
[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-17 04:00 pm UTC (link)
his oft-repeated refrain, when taken out of its narrow legal meaning, is nonsense, and an obvious one at that. People are most certainly NOT "created equal" in terms of their abilities. People are, in fact, born with vastly varying talents and equally vastly varying capacities for heightened consciousness. This holds true for both men and women.

I'm not talking about ability here, rather about inherent worth.

It might be true that typically women tend to be less cerebral than men. It might also be true that women tend to "think" with their hearts rather than their brains. An yes, in the realm of halacha women are indeed "second class citizens" (if you prefer to use this kind of bombastic language). However the realm of halacha is not the entirety of life (no, I am not suggesting that Halacha doesn't govern all life endeavors.) There are SO many other creative endeavors beside deciding on the Law...

People still constantly repeat this ridiculous refrain about women "thinking with their hearts" or being more emotional, less cerebral. I just want one person to explain to me how that perspective jives with the fact that most people in jail for crimes of passion and violent crimes are... men. And that illogical wars to protect pride at the expense of lives are generally started by... men. How does that work cfkaMP?

For most Orthodox Jews, the realm of Halacha governs and controls everything they do. So I don't see how being a second-class citizen in halacha is somehow different than being a second class citizen in life. Maye you are trying to argue the "individual household" position in which you point out that many men, in fact, defer to their wives in many aspects. So what? In Saudia Arabia, where women can't drive or leave the house without a male chaperone, I'm sure that there are some women who dominate their households and insist that their husbands drop everything and drive them around. So what? It doesn't negate the overall confines of the system.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 04:17 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:21 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 04:37 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:46 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 05:13 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 06:05 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:22 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 04:39 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:43 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 05:09 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 06:07 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:26 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:46 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 05:06 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 06:18 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 07:55 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 09:43 pm UTC
Re: All people are created equal. ! or ? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 06:20 pm UTC
women less cerebral?
(Anonymous)
2009-05-17 07:22 pm UTC (link)
I'd rather a rabbi who thinks from his/her heart, than one who thinks from his dick.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: women less cerebral? - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 09:49 pm UTC
Re: women less cerebral? - [info]livelife73, 2009-05-18 01:04 pm UTC

[info]24816
2009-05-17 03:55 pm UTC (link)
I feel sufficiently empowered even if I don’t make halachic decisions.
I often feel empowered at work even if I don’t get to rule on every policy.
In my youth I felt much less in charge in nonsense socialist environment where everyone was supposed to be equal.
3 out of my four great grandfathers had smichas and two of my great-grandmothers had their own business, they were not oppressed in any way.

You can say that the oppressed servants lull themselves with the notion that they are in charge when they just resort to manipulation, etc. but think about G-d - He is powerful enough to provide, control, manipulate and give an impression of independency (and even empowerment). So why cannot you see that women share the same characteristics?

It is my understanding that men hormones make them aggressive and women hormones make them promote agreement. With age hormonal level gets reduced and men become less aggressive, while women …
The society adjusts to it, e.g. even in military where men hate to report to women, they don’t mind to report to middle age “mother-figure” women.
My Chinese coworker was very bitter about their historical mistreatment of women, particularly her father’s mentality, but when she brought her mother to work, I noticed that her mother didn’t seem too submissive. When I mentioned it, she laughed, “oh, no, my mother is not submissive at all!”

Also, as I said earlier:
Feminism puts double burden on women
I've seen men turn into sissies when women take over. It might be safer to stick to what works than to experiment with social engineering and years later come to "ooops", G-d forbid.
Perhaps to develop their potential men do need to take responsibility, to build fraternities, to learn in segregated classes?
Personally I feel empowered when my needs are met and people are taken care of. In that case it is not that important who takes the credit, like if G-d came to me and said that my offspring will be OK, and grow, and will not participate in nonsense, etc., and perhaps even make some difference, I could live with that.

-m

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-17 04:08 pm UTC (link)
I feel sufficiently empowered even if I don’t make halachic decisions.
Okay, so you have convinced yourself that if you make decisions about what color curtains you should by, that is enough. Good.

My Chinese coworker was very bitter about their historical mistreatment of women, particularly her father’s mentality, but when she brought her mother to work, I noticed that her mother didn’t seem too submissive. When I mentioned it, she laughed, “oh, no, my mother is not submissive at all!”

Yeah, see my Saudia Arabia example above. Just because some men are less domineering than others doesn't mean the overall system isn't flawed.

Feminism puts double burden on women

Anything that doesn't involve eating chocolate bon-bons on the couch puts a double burden on women. For example, today, I have to clean my house AND go shopping. Double burden. In the evening I will also have to exercise, which puts on me a TRIPLE burden. Maybe I will work on a project for school, QUADRUPLE burden. Oh, no, I also have to be a good wife and spend time hanging out with my husband. There's another burden!

Everyone has lots of burdens, feminism makes no difference. Before feminism, women had double burdens of being good wives AND good mothers. Now they can also choose to take on the burden of being a good CEO, if they feel like it.

I've seen men turn into sissies when women take over. It might be safer to stick to what works than to experiment with social engineering and years later come to "ooops", G-d forbid.

I've seen women who turn into horrible parents when they have more than 4 children. Should we tell everyone how many kids they can have?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 07:47 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 08:37 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-18 11:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 12:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-18 01:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-17 07:32 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-17 09:48 pm UTC
Do not call 911, but I look at it quite differently. - [info]24816, 2009-05-18 11:41 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-17 07:16 pm UTC (link)
1. What would god do?

God in his role as creator gave women some pretty clear disadvantages to women ie smaller body size w/ less muscle mass for one. Why? I don't know. I wasn't in on the consultation.

Yet God in his role as the one who demands justice, could not and would never demand of US to discriminate based on might; If you believe in justice, then might does not make right.

The dichotomy between these to aspect of God (assuming for arguments sake they are one and the same party) is pretty much the same as why does god create conditions that promote injustice/suffering/evil anywhere in the world and yet demand that we overcome the conditions that he himself created. That is the paradox of life.

2. Can women be fulfilled as second class?
Yes, women often find alternate routes to status and fulfillment.
And some (probably very few) women do not allow the prescription of inferiority to affect their self image.
For some women, if they are highly respected in their own families (and how often that occurs, we don't know) is enough compensation for their inferiority at the public level.
But for the most gifted and intelligent, it's probably not enough.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]mrn613
2009-05-18 12:43 am UTC (link)
Mindy is a satmar chasida and satmar is the most right wing orthodox jewish community in the u.s. she is not representative of orthodoxy, even non-modern orthodoxy, as a whole.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 01:24 am UTC (link)
I think Satmar chassidim are great enough in number that we cannot discount them that easily.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mrn613, 2009-05-18 02:17 am UTC

[info]tatianalarina
2009-05-18 12:58 am UTC (link)
Honestly, it depends on your personality. But I think that women are more likely than men to accept this notion of being second-class citizens. It is, of course, nonsense that there are more dumb women than men. There are more average women than men. There are more dumb, and also more brilliant, men than women. Someone who is brilliant will have a hard time accepting a second-rate position in society. Someone who is dumb is more likely to have a skewed view of himself, so he also won't accept this. It is precisely the more "average" people who are inclined towards harmony, and statistically those happen to be women.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 01:22 am UTC (link)
'Someone who is dumb is more likely to have a skewed view of himself..."

Here's a great article I just read on this:
http://www.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2009/features/toolbox.html

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]tatianalarina, 2009-05-18 01:28 am UTC

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]tatianalarina, 2009-05-18 02:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]llennhoff, 2009-05-18 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 02:55 am UTC

[info]livelife73
2009-05-18 01:20 pm UTC (link)
I am an Orthodox Jew.
There is so much to say, I have researched this exact topic for years.
I am a member of JOFA (Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance).

The mission of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance is to expand the spiritual, ritual, intellectual and political opportunities for women within the framework of halakha. We advocate meaningful participation and equality for women in family life, synagogues, houses of learning and Jewish communal organizations to the full extent possible within halakha. Our commitment is rooted in the belief that fulfilling this mission will enrich and uplift individual and communal life for all Jews.

I do not feel like a second class citizen, but sometimes unrightly so, am treated as such in my community.It is a lifelong journey. We don't have all the answers, but because I will never stop asking questions.



I wrote a bit about it in my live journal... here:
USING MY KOL ISHA

There is so much to reflect on. Why are the imahot missing from our liturgy? And can we change what has been done for generations? Many synagogues now include the imahot in mi shaberakhs for the sick, and in prayer for the soldiers of Israel. Can we look for ways to be even more inclusive? Can we include Miriam's song after Moshe's when we pray every morning?"

-Carol Kaufman Newman
President Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance

I have approached leaders in my Orthodox community to ask that women who are being held captive by agunot are included in prayers after the prayers for the Soldiers of Israel and the Soldiers that are held captive. So why not for the women whom are held captive by agunot?

And even provided the prayer:

(photo of tefillah here)

I was told no.


Why can't we have a women's minyan? And I stress WOMEN's. Even if it is just for a bat mitzvah, we do have two sanctuaries in my shul.

Why can't we have a women's Rosh Chodesh activity or Shiur that is just for women? It is OUR holiday after all?

It has nothing to do with being an Orthodox shul. None of the things I am asking goes against Torah or Halacha.
G-D forbid.

The dream for my shul is:

*Women speaking from the amud.
*Passing the Torah to the women's section
*Women saying Birkat HaGomel
*Prayer for Agunot
*Mother's names in Mi'Sheberach and/or Aliyot
*Women feeling comfortable to go to the front of the women's section to say Kaddish


And since my shul promotes family and having lots of yummy Jewish children, then they should provide adequate childcare during Friday night services, and ALL Shabbat day services including Mincha, Sludat Slesheet and Maariv. That is key for most women I know. We want to participate but need child care in order to do so.


IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK???????????????????????????


I need answers to my questions. I am not getting them.
Feedback would be much appreciated.



(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 03:45 pm UTC (link)
Interesting that you write about shul and prayer. I find that I am very not interested in shul and/or tefillah in the least. I think that might be because I have very little role in the whole process. My husband and I can go to the same shul and have totally different experiences of the service. For me, it is just two hours of quiet mumblings interspersed with passing observing and listening to what the men are doing. Not exactly something I feel like climbing out of bed shabbos morning for. Simchas torah is similarly a very passive experience for many women. To some extent, I think this results in women downplaying the role of the shul. I clearly remember a couple of different occasions when I expressed annoyance that women didn't have a minyan, couldn't be counted, etc, and the response I got was "What? You WANT to go to shul? To be there 3 times a day and be OBLIGATED to show up? Why? Shul's not that important." I think this is a form of rationalization that many frum women, including myself, use- I can't be involved in this activity, so it must be a boring or unimportant one.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ymarkov, 2009-05-18 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 11:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-19 10:45 pm UTC

[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 03:47 pm UTC (link)
Also, can you link me to your blog again?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]livelife73, 2009-05-19 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-19 01:15 am UTC
Kol Isha - [info]livelife73, 2009-05-19 01:59 am UTC

[info]ymarkov
2009-05-18 03:32 pm UTC (link)
There's already a lot of discussion here, and much of what I'd have to say would be repetitious or wheel-spinning. I'll add only this:

if there is a God and He created the world, do you think that He could have set up a system in which women are meant to be subservient?
I don't believe that this is the right way of looking at this. God doesn't set up social systems, people do. And if the Sanhedrin was operating today, I believe it'd do some serious updating of halakhot relating to women.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 03:35 pm UTC (link)
But He set up the Cohanim/Leviim thing. Is that not a similar system?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ymarkov, 2009-05-18 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 08:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymarkov, 2009-05-18 09:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 11:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ymarkov, 2009-05-19 01:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]24816, 2009-05-18 11:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-18 11:17 pm UTC
world population - [info]bringing_peace, 2009-05-20 01:27 am UTC
work vs. home- you guys are barking up the wrong issue.
(Anonymous)
2009-05-18 04:12 pm UTC (link)
Isn't it so annoying how discussions of Judaism and feminism always slip into the tired work vs. home debate? Something that is totally irrelevant to Judaism?

Judaism expressed absolutely no opinion on whether it is better for women to be full time homemakers, or full time career women, or something in between. The glorification of motherhood as women's primary spiritual role resonates deeply with many women but it is still a recent development, a kind of alternate feminism, probably invented a by kiruv apologist, and maybe even borrowed from American protestantism. (Not that that makes it wrong or anything).

Halacha as it is interpreted from the Bavli, exempts women from the mitzva of procreation altogether. Halacha actually views the FATHER as primarily responsible for his childrens Torah and worldly education. Custody of children in times of the gemara primarily went to the FATHER. The halacha in addition had no objections to wealthy women hiring nannies, or even wet-nurses to breastfeed their babies for them. The Eshet Hayil whom we sing about every friday night, among her many activities is also a business woman.

So basically this is the wrong issue to harp about. When discussing women in Judaism, we should be discussiong other issues entirely- exclusion from religious life, exclusion from community influence, inherent worth, and limited rights within the marriage framework according to many poskim(although thanks to modern law these are rarely practiced with the exception of agunah).

Sara Maimon

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: work vs. home- you guys are barking up the wrong issue.
[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-18 09:04 pm UTC (link)
I agree, Sara, but I think that some people consider that the price to pay for being able to stay at home is being relegated to second-class citizen status.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

obligations v worth
(Anonymous)
2009-05-19 05:44 pm UTC (link)
I don't see the correlation between a person's value and his judaic obligations. Is a Kohen who is a ba'al mum and cannot perform the avodah worth less than a kohen who is not? Or a Yisrael? Why don't you consider them to be second class citizens? I don't think the number of mitzvos a person is obligated correlates to his intrinsic self-worth.

Don't bring in your "if a man and woman are drowning" argument again because that's based on a cost-benefit analysis and not the person's worth. A Mamzer Talmud Chacham is saved before the Kohen Gadul or the King. Doesn't make the King a second class citizen.

If your perception is that woman are treated as second class citizens then I would say that this is a social issue and not a religious issue. Rave against the culture, not the canon.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: obligations v worth
(Anonymous)
2009-05-19 06:07 pm UTC (link)
meant to type "If your perception is that women . . ."

A Metzorah has more obligations than an ordinary Yisrael. That doesn't make the Metzorah more valued.

The curse "and he will dominate you" is not a commandment any more than menstruation is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: obligations v worth - (Anonymous), 2009-05-19 10:52 pm UTC
Re: obligations v worth - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-20 12:49 pm UTC
Re: obligations v worth - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-20 12:54 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-19 08:26 pm UTC (link)
Dear OSM
The book of Genesis tells us that after the sin in the Garden of Eden, Go-d designated an hierarchical system in which the man is supposed to rule over the woman (in reality, in most cases, it is the other way around... I have never seen any man who would not resort in the end of the day to the "Yes Dear" response to almost whatever the wife demands.) It does not matter whether this is really what Go-d had said or a religious explanation to a known, factual, social order that is probably based on nature. In the end of the day there is a basic scientific fact that men and women are, should we say, different.

Halakha does not empower a woman to be a man nor does it empower a man to be a woman. actually, it discourages that strongly. Does it empower the woman at all? That depends in what you call "to empower." Regardless, most normal women should not have a problem with that. Most normal women, if asked whether they wanted to be men, would answer in the negative as they are sure about their identities.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-20 11:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-20 12:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-21 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-05-21 01:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fetteredwolf, 2009-07-08 10:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onionsoupmix, 2009-07-08 11:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fetteredwolf, 2009-07-09 12:50 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2009-05-22 03:50 am UTC (link)
I thought of this today as my 6 yr old daughter had her siddur ceremony at school. The school is "traditional", but not officially "Orthodox", and it serves the entire community. They went through the shacharit service, and came to the morning blessings. Sure enough, the boys said, "shelo asani isha". I had trouble catching my breath for a moment. I know the whole rational for that blessing, I know the rational behind saying that we don't alter the ancient words of the siddur, I know how I chose to stop going to a Conservative shul and started going to an Orthodox one...but that one blessing just stopped me cold this morning. I can choose to ignore or overlook some things for myself. It's harder when my daughters are involved.

At the same time, I realized that my thoughts were distracting me from what was, overall, an amazing ceremony, and one that filled my little girl with joy.

So honestly, that's my dilemna. There are a few things that I can't really justify or reconcile (and honestly don't believe are mandated by Hashem), but at the same time I'm not prepared to throw away all that I love about being a part of traditional Judaism and the Jewish community because of it.

I think I've also decided that, while I'm not always sure of my exact "place", that it's somewhere in the realm of left-wing/progressive Orthodoxy. Here's why: I don't want to see equality as someone that we may as well accept because we've deep-sixed so many other elements of halacha. I want to see equality as something important from the perspective of authentic, halachic Judaism. As well, while it's certainly more difficult, I find it more satisfying when I can make progressive arguments to frum Jews.

JRKmommy

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-22 12:48 pm UTC (link)
yes, I think you are right, many people subscribe to this notion- that orthodoxy is a package deal; you can't have the beautiful without accepting a bit of the unappealing as well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-22 04:14 am UTC (link)
Actual correspondence (with names removed) for your reading pleasure from one of my late bubby's rabbi, so I think I can argue that there is an actual minhag of progressive attitudes on gender roles in my family. The letter was written in response to a disgruntled congregant who objected to the idea of allowing women to be considered for shul president [posted in 2 parts due to the length]:

Dear __

Your recent letters provide me with the opportunity to offer my views as to the nature of Orthodoxy and the basis of unity in our Congregation. Other matters will be clarified if we can come to an understanding about these two fundamental issues.

An Orthodox synagogue is one in which the rule of Halakhic law and tradition is supreme and is interpreted and applied by an ordained rabbi who is trained to interpret and apply the legal tradition to contemporary issues.

This fundamental consideration is very different from non-Orthodox congregations wherein the members often decide on their own what should or should not be done without reference to Halakhic procedure. In some cases they may give much weight to Halakhah but are also influenced by what they call History and Tradition (Conservative) or disregard Halakhah completely in favour of what is convenient or comfortable (Reform).

But again, Orthodoxy has staked its emphasis and commitment to the Jewish legal tradition as the Word of G-d that must be obeyed. Orthodox Jews submit their questions to their rabbi and submit to his decisions.

If we are going to have an Orthodox congregation then we are all going to work for this principle and realise that the rabbi has a key role to play. Neither [names of members] have the expert knowledge required to render Halakhic judgements. I do not know of anyone else in the congregation who does. If anyone of these or other members wishes to serve in an administrative capacity they can so be chosen by the members. But they cannot function as replacements for the rabbi and pronounce on what is or is not halakhically valid course of behaviour.

Furthermore, our congregation is constituted of members who identify with Orthodoxy and who may wish congregation affairs to be guided by Orthodox policies but they themselves are not completely observant in an Orthodox fashion. We call these kinds of people today the 'non-observant Orthodox'.

In some Orthodox synagogues none of the above type persons would be welcome to serve in any official capacity. In others they would not even be offered to go to the Torah for an Aliyah. Their lack of complete observance would disqualify them. In these congregations the members readily submit to the decisions of the Rabbi.

There are other factors in Jewish identity. These may include an attachment to community, past and present; nostalgia for a lost community or family traditions; attachment to Israel and charitable concern for Jews everywhere. However, for Orthodoxy the primary commitment is the observance of G-d's commandments in the Torah as implemented in the Halakhah.

Continued in part 2:

[JRKmommy]

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2009-05-22 04:15 am UTC (link)
Part 2:

So, nostalgia may be important but it is not enough to go on. If one or another group insists on its nostalgic vision to be implemented then there will be no room for other groups in our Synagogue. Halakhah does not work only on what was done in the past; it must decide for the present. Orthodox Jews ask their rabbis if heart transplants and in-vitro fertilisation techniques are permissible. The fact that one hundred or five hundred or one thousand years ago they were not done does not mean that they are forbidden. These questions are decided upon using the components of Jewish law from the Babylonian Talmud and subsequent codes and commentaries that relate to these questions. They are interpreted and applied. Sometimes a consensus of rabbis is reached and, sometimes, differing perspectives remain.

If we wish to create unity in our congregation it must be on this fundamental. If we wish to move to a stricter interpretation of Orthodoxy as noted above we can discuss this. However, it is improper to conduct these discussions without the Rabbi present. Otherwise the sources of Torah are absent and the discussion is no longer one based on Torah and for the sake of heaven.

On the question of whether or not a woman can be President of a synagogue both Hazzan __ and myself agree that there is no Halakhic objection. An Iraqi rabbi, the late Rabbi Hayyim David Halevi who served as Chief Rabbi for many years, wrote that in voluntary situations people can give authority to a woman to be a judge in a religious court for civil matters, for example.

We also have the precedent of Golda Meir. Orthodox rabbis served in her cabinet and I do not recall any objection to her being chosen as a leader of a Jewish community. In 18th century Kurdistan, Asnat Barzani, a scholarly woman, succeeded her husband as head of a Yeshivah.

Finally, we have the example of Deborah, the Biblical prophet, judge and leader who ruled our nation over 3000 years ago.

So in my mind there is no religious Halakhic issue here. If there are other issues to be discussed in this matter then they should be brought forth but not under the cover of religion. Religiously I do not see any issue.

I know that some people are uncomfortable with the more elevated opportunities women have in Canada and other Western countries. But this is the reality. If we deny women valid opportunities in our communities we will lose the respect of our women for Judaism. This would be the end of our tradition for they would not teach their children about something that denies their dignity.

I hope that all those who wish to see our congregation continue in the ways of Orthodox Judaism will rally around the proper comprehension of this term and not use it so selectively promote their own special interests. I hope to continue to be able to have the opportunities to teach and explain to our members how an active, serious and devoted Jewish life can enrich their lives. I hope we can all work together to promote the observance of Shabbat, the dietary laws, regular attendance at the Synagogue all year long and all the other beautiful obligations by which Jews have lived for thousands of years but which now appear to be distant to many of our members. We would then be approaching the ideals of an Orthodox synagogue.

Rabbi ___

[JRKmommy]

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]onionsoupmix
2009-05-22 12:43 pm UTC (link)
Thanks very much for posting, was this written recently? Does this rabbi belong to a particular denomination within Orthodoxy?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2009-05-22 04:09 pm UTC

(97 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…